The Internet is in danger (in the US too)

Asmongold TV

This video has been trending in United States, Papua New Guinea, Canada, and Australia

The video warns that a pair of U.S. Supreme Court cases—Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh—could reshape the legal foundation that has allowed the modern internet to flourish. At the heart of both lawsuits is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the 1996 statute that shields websites from liability for most content posted by users. The plaintiffs claim that YouTube’s and Twitter’s recommendation algorithms “aided and abetted” terrorism by amplifying extremist videos and accounts. If the Justices find that algorithmic targeting strips platforms of Section 230 protection, every major social network, forum, review site, and even comment section could suddenly be exposed to lawsuits over anything users upload.

The video explains how Section 230 made possible the explosion of user-generated content by letting platforms moderate without fearing endless litigation. It then details the arguments on both sides: petitioners say automated recommendations are distinct editorial choices that should trigger liability, while the tech companies counter that algorithms are simply scalable versions of chronological feeds and are indispensable for sorting billions of posts. Several Justices seem skeptical of rewriting internet law from the bench, but they also appear concerned about unchecked algorithmic amplification of harmful material.

Possible outcomes range from a narrow ruling limited to terrorism-related content to a sweeping decision that rewrites the liability framework for all online speech. A broad ruling could force platforms to pre-screen or heavily throttle user posts, leading to more aggressive takedowns, age-gating, paywalls, and the end of open comments. Large incumbents with deep moderation budgets might survive, but smaller sites, startups, and nonprofits could shut down rather than assume the risk of costly litigation. The result would be a less diverse, more homogenized web—one that echoes legacy media gatekeeping.

The presenter stresses that Congress, not the Supreme Court, is better suited to update internet law in a targeted way. He urges viewers to stay informed, contact elected officials, and push for balanced reforms that tackle harmful content without crushing free expression or innovation. The internet’s future, he argues, hinges on whether policymakers can preserve the benefits of broad immunity while addressing the undeniable downsides of algorithmic amplification.

Share Video

¿Do you like The Internet is in danger (in the US too)? Share it with your people...

Playlist