Who ACTUALLY owns Ai art?

DougDougDoug

This video has been trending in Canada, Papua New Guinea, United Kingdom, and United States

Sure, here is the article:

Title: The Copyright Conundrum: Who Actually Owns AI Art?

Welcome, gamers, to an emergency episode of Techno Tuesday! Today, we're diving into the world of AI art and discussing the age-old question – Who ACTUALLY owns AI art? With AI images and videos taking the internet by storm, the question of ownership has become more complex and intriguing than ever before.

Enter the world of AI image generators like Mid Journey and Sora from OpenAI. These cutting-edge tools are pushing the boundaries of creativity with their high-quality output that rivals even the most skilled human artists. But as these AI creations become more sophisticated, the question of ownership becomes increasingly relevant.

You may have seen AI-generated images and wondered, who holds the rights to these works? If a person uses an AI program to create a video or image, do they own it? Does the AI company own it? Or perhaps the original creator of the training data? This issue becomes crucial when considering the potential uses of AI art in mediums like video games and books.

In the world of copyright law, ownership is key. Copyright grants creators the exclusive rights to their work, allowing them to control how it is used, reproduced, and distributed. In the US, creators automatically hold copyright over their creations, whether it's a painting, a piece of writing, or even an AI-generated image.

To delve into this complex issue, let's play a little game called 'Can You Copyright?' Imagine proposing to your girlfriend at the beach and capturing the perfect moment on your phone, only to have a dog accidentally take the photo. Who owns the picture? According to the US Copyright Office, only humans can hold copyright, so in this case, the dog would not be able to claim ownership.

A famous case involving a monkey taking a selfie further illustrates this point. Despite the monkey's involvement in taking the photo, the copyright office ruled that only humans can hold copyright, denying ownership to the photographer who set up the shot. The monkey's photo remained in the public domain.

In another scenario, imagine replicating a centuries-old painting with meticulous precision. While you may have put in extensive effort to recreate the artwork, copyright law requires a creative element for protection. Without adding your unique expression to the painting, you would not be able to claim copyright over your replica.

This highlights the crucial distinction between effort and creativity in copyright law. Simply replicating an existing work, whether created by a human or AI, does not confer copyright ownership. Only when a new and original work is created can copyright protection be granted.

So, who actually owns AI art? The answer is not as straightforward as one might think. As AI technology continues to advance, the intersection of creativity, ownership, and copyright law will become increasingly complex and fascinating. As gamers and creators, it's essential to understand the implications of AI art and where ownership rights lie in this evolving landscape.

In conclusion, the question of ownership in the realm of AI art poses intriguing challenges that require a nuanced understanding of copyright law and creativity. As AI continues to revolutionize the gaming industry and beyond, the issue of ownership will undoubtedly spark further debate and exploration. Stay tuned for more updates on the evolving world of AI art and copyright law in gaming and beyond

Share Video

¿Do you like Who ACTUALLY owns Ai art?? Share it with your people...

Playlist